s each year.
Childrennation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
under 5 years old account for nearly 45% of all severe burns and scalds. About 50% of these accidents ha
and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
ppen in the kitchen.
Cups of hot drinks are involved in about 1,265 severe burns a year (requiring admission
ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
to hospital), of which 1,100 occur with children less than 5 years of age. Most involve the child reaching up
ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.
Following aspects would a
and pulling a mug or cup of hot drink on to himself or herself.
Baths are involved in over 570 severe burns
dd to the challenges in developing combination products:
Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
Which combination prod
a year. Most involve an unsupervised child falling or climbing into a bath of very hot water.
Other common c
cts are meaningful and rational?
Which therapeutic categories to select?
Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
Do combin
uses of severe burns include kettles, teapots and coffee-pots, jugs of hot water, saucepans, irons, cookers,
tions increase the patient compliance?
What would be the developing cost?
How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
ires and heaters, and chip pans and deep fat fryers.
If you or someone you know have been injured as a resul
t?
As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
tionalinjuryclaims.com/amounts.html" target="_blank">claim for compensation and it may be prud
y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
nt to seek advise from a specialist solicitor on a true no win , no fee* basis. There is very likely to be an
.
As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
insurer responsible to pay such compensation, whether it be an accident at work [employers liability insuran
elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.
Companies that provide selfless information through particip
e], at some other person or bodies premises [ public liability insurance] or at home [ household insurance]
tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products